Ubicación: Global + English
Global Global Algérie Français Algeria English Angola Português Angola English Argentina Español Argentina English Australia English Austria Deutsch Austria English Azerbaijan English Azerbaijan Русский Bahrain English Bangladesh English Belgium English Belgium Français Belgium Nederlands Brazil Português Brazil English Bulgaria български Bulgaria English Cameroon English Cameroon Français Canada English Canada Français Chile Español Chile English China 中文 China 日本語 China English Colombia Español Colombia English Croatia English Czech Republic Čeština Czech Republic English Denmark English Djibouti English Ecuador Español Ecuador English Egypt English Estonia English Ethiopia English Finland Suomi Finland English France Français France English Georgia English Georgia Русский Germany Deutsch Germany English Ghana English Greece Ελληνικά Greece English Guatemala Español Guatemala English Hong Kong, China English Hong Kong, China 中文 Hungary Magyar Hungary English India English Indonesia English Iraq English Ireland English Italy Italiano Italy English Ivory Coast Français Ivory Coast English Japan 日本語 Japan English Jordan English Kazakhstan Русский Kazakhstan English Kenya English Kuwait English Kyrgyzstan Русский Kyrgyzstan English Latvia English Lithuania English Malaysia English Mauritius English Mauritius français (Maurice) Mexico Español Mexico English Moldova Română Moldova English Mongolia English Morocco English Morocco Français Mozambique Português Mozambique English Netherlands Nederlands Netherlands English New Zealand English Nigeria English Norway English Oman English Pakistan English Paraguay Español Paraguay English Peru Español Peru English Philippines English Poland Polski Poland English Portugal Português Portugal English Qatar English Republic of Korea 한국어 Republic of Korea English Romania Română Romania English Saudi Arabia English Serbia Српски Serbia English Singapore English Slovakia English Slovenia English South Africa English Spain English Spain Español Sri Lanka English Sweden English Switzerland Deutsch Switzerland Français Switzerland Italiano Switzerland English Tanzania English Thailand ไทย Thailand English Togo English Togo Français Tunisia English Tunisia Français Türkiye Türkçe Türkiye English Turkmenistan Русский Turkmenistan English Ukraine Українська Ukraine English United Arab Emirates English United Kingdom English Uruguay Español Uruguay English USA English Uzbekistan English Uzbekistan Русский Vietnam Tiếng Việt Vietnam English

Injection molding volumetric shrinkage testing quantifies the reduction in volume that occurs when a molten polymer solidifies within a mold cavity, providing critical data for tooling design, dimensional control, and warpage prediction. This testing is performed according to internationally recognized standards such as ISO 294-4, ASTM D955, and GB/T 17037.4 in accredited third-party laboratories. This article explains the testing principles, sample requirements, measurement methods, and industrial applications of volumetric shrinkage evaluation for thermoplastic materials.

Technical Overview

Volumetric shrinkage is a fundamental material behavior in injection molding that describes the decrease in volume of a plastic part as it transitions from a compressed, molten state inside the mold cavity to a solid, ambient-condition state after cooling and ejection. The volumetric shrinkage rate is defined as the ratio of the volume difference between the mold cavity and the molded part to the volume of the mold cavity, typically expressed as a percentage:

Sv = (Vcavity − Vpart) / Vcavity × 100%

This phenomenon arises from three physical mechanisms acting simultaneously during the molding cycle: thermal contraction as the polymer cools from melt temperature to room temperature, crystallization-induced densification in semi-crystalline polymers, and the pressure-volume-temperature (pvT) behavior of the polymer melt under packing pressure. Semi-crystalline materials such as polypropylene (PP), polyethylene (PE), polyamide (PA), and PBT typically exhibit volumetric shrinkage in the range of 1.5% to 3.5%, while amorphous materials such as polystyrene (PS), ABS, polycarbonate (PC), and PMMA generally show lower values between 0.4% and 0.8%.

Accurate determination of volumetric shrinkage is essential because uneven or excessive shrinkage leads to dimensional deviations, sink marks, voids, warpage, and assembly failures. The principal testing frameworks include ISO 294-4 (determination of moulding shrinkage), ASTM D955 (measuring shrinkage from mold dimensions), GB/T 17037.4 (the Chinese national standard aligned with ISO 294-4), and ISO 17744 for pvT characterization used in shrinkage prediction.

Testing Samples

Standard Dumbbell Specimens

Multi-purpose Type A dumbbell specimens produced in accordance with ISO 3167 and ISO 294-1 are the most widely used samples for shrinkage testing. These specimens must be molded under tightly controlled and documented processing conditions, including melt temperature, mold temperature, injection speed, holding pressure, holding time, and cooling time, because each parameter directly influences the measured shrinkage value.

Plate Specimens

Square plate specimens of 60 mm × 60 mm × 2 mm, as specified in ISO 294-3, are used to evaluate shrinkage in flow and transverse directions on a well-defined geometry. Plates are particularly valuable for assessing shrinkage anisotropy, which is pronounced in fiber-reinforced and liquid crystal polymer systems.

Custom Plaques and Actual Components

For engineering development and failure analysis, shrinkage can be evaluated on custom plaques of defined wall thickness or on production parts. In these cases, the mold cavity dimensions must be measured precisely before molding so that cavity-to-part volume comparison is valid.

Conditioning Requirements

All specimens must be conditioned prior to measurement, typically for 16 to 24 hours at 23 °C ± 2 °C and 50% ± 10% relative humidity, unless otherwise specified by the applicable material standard. This conditioning allows post-ejection relaxation and moisture equilibration, ensuring reproducible results.

Testing Items

  • Volumetric shrinkage rate (overall three-dimensional volume reduction)
  • Linear mold shrinkage parallel to flow direction (Sp)
  • Linear mold shrinkage perpendicular to flow direction (Sm)
  • Shrinkage anisotropy ratio (Sp/Sm), critical for glass-filled materials
  • Post-molding shrinkage after heat treatment or annealing
  • Density of the molded specimen, measured per ISO 1183
  • Reproducibility of shrinkage across the molding window

Testing Methods

Dimensional Measurement Method

The cavity dimensions of the mold are measured using calibrated coordinate measuring instruments, and the corresponding dimensions of the molded specimens are measured after conditioning. Linear shrinkage in each direction is calculated as the dimensional difference divided by the cavity dimension. The volumetric shrinkage is then derived by combining the three orthogonal linear shrinkage values: Sv = 1 − (1 − Sl)(1 − Sw)(1 − St). This approach follows the core procedure of ISO 294-4, ASTM D955, and GB/T 17037.4.

Density-Based (Archimedes) Method

Volumetric shrinkage can be determined by comparing the actual volume of the molded part, obtained from its mass and density measured by the Archimedes immersion technique per ISO 1183-1, with the geometric volume of the mold cavity. This method is especially useful for complex-shaped components where direct dimensional mapping is impractical.

pvT Data Analysis Method

Per ISO 17744, a pvT diagram characterizes the specific volume of the polymer as a function of temperature and pressure. By integrating the pvT path experienced by the material during filling, packing, and cooling, the theoretical volumetric shrinkage at any location within the part can be calculated. This method is the basis for shrinkage and warpage simulation in injection molding CAE analysis.

Post-Molding Shrinkage and Annealing Test

Specimens are re-measured after annealing at an elevated temperature (for example, 24 hours at 80 °C to 120 °C, depending on the material) to determine post-molding shrinkage. This value indicates the additional dimensional change a part may undergo in service and is essential for high-precision applications and assemblies.

Applications

Volumetric shrinkage test data supports a wide range of engineering and quality activities:

  • Mold design and cavity compensation calculations to achieve target part dimensions
  • Material datasheet development and comparative material selection
  • Warpage and sink mark prediction for CAE simulation model validation
  • Optimization of holding pressure, holding time, and cooling parameters
  • Quality control for incoming resins and verification of material lot consistency
  • Failure analysis of dimensionally nonconforming molded parts
  • Qualification of recycled or regrind-containing compounds
  • Automotive, electronics, packaging, medical device, and appliance component development

FAQ

What is the difference between mold shrinkage and volumetric shrinkage?

Mold shrinkage refers to the linear dimensional change measured in a single direction between the cavity and the part, whereas volumetric shrinkage describes the total three-dimensional volume reduction. Volumetric shrinkage is always equal to or greater than individual linear shrinkage values and provides a more complete picture of material densification during solidification.

Which standards govern volumetric shrinkage testing?

The primary standards are ISO 294-4 and its Chinese counterpart GB/T 17037.4 for the determination of molding shrinkage, ASTM D955 for shrinkage from mold dimensions, ISO 294-1 and ISO 294-3 for specimen preparation, ISO 1183 for density measurement, and ISO 17744 for pvT characterization. Accredited third-party laboratories typically select the standard that matches the customer specification and target market.

What processing factors most strongly influence shrinkage results?

Holding pressure and holding time are the dominant factors, as they compensate for volume loss during solidification. Mold temperature, melt temperature, wall thickness, gate size and location, and cooling time also have significant effects. For this reason, test reports must always state the complete molding conditions alongside the shrinkage values.

What are typical volumetric shrinkage values for common plastics?

Amorphous polymers such as PS, ABS, PC, and PMMA generally exhibit volumetric shrinkage of roughly 0.4% to 0.8%. Semi-crystalline polymers such as PP, PE, PA6, PA66, POM, and PBT typically range from 1.5% to 3.5%, with higher values for unfilled grades and highly crystalline materials.

What information is included in a typical test report?

A professional report includes the material identification and lot number, specimen geometry, complete molding conditions, conditioning details, the measurement method and equipment, individual and average shrinkage values in each direction, calculated volumetric shrinkage, and references to the applied standards. Testing conducted by accredited third-party laboratories additionally documents measurement uncertainty and equipment calibration status.